Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate with details

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate is low, but it is improving. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is that the malignant transformation and proliferation of lymphoid progenitor cells within the bone marrow, blood, and extramedullary sites.

Although 80% of ALL occurs in children, when it occurs in adults, it represents a devastating disease. It is also known as Acute lymphocytic leukemia.

The term “acute” in acute lymphoblastic leukemia comes from the fact that the disease progresses rapidly and produces immature cells. Blood cells, not mature cells.

The term “lymphocyte” in acute lymphoblastic leukemia refers to the white blood cells called lymphocytes that are affected by ALL.

In the United States, the incidence of ALL is estimated to be 1.6 per 100,000 people. In 2016 alone, approximately 6,590 new cases were diagnosed, of which more than 1,400 died of ALL (American Cancer Society).

The incidence of ALL presents a bimodal distribution, the first peak appears in childhood, and the second peak appears around 50.2 years of age.

Although the dose-escalation strategy has significantly improved the prognosis of pediatric patients, the prognosis of the elderly is still poor.

Although the response rate to induction chemotherapy is high, only 30-40% of adult ALL patients will achieve long-term remission.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate

Pathophysiology of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate

The pathogenesis of ALL involves abnormal proliferation and differentiation of lymphocyte clonal populations.

Studies of the pediatric population have identified genetic syndromes that are predisposed to a small number of ALL cases.

Such as Down syndrome, Fanconi anemia, Bloom syndrome, ataxia-telangiectasia, and Nijmegen rupture syndrome.

Other susceptibility factors include exposure to ionizing radiation, pesticides, certain solvents or viruses, such as Epstein-Barr virus and human immunodeficiency virus.

However, in most cases, it appears as a new malignant tumor in previously healthy individuals. Chromosomal aberrations are a sign of ALL, but they are not enough to cause leukemia. Characteristic translocations include MLL rearrangements.

Recently, a variant with a gene expression profile similar to Ph-positive ALL (Philadelphia) but without the BCR-ABL1 rearrangement has been identified.

In more than 80% of cases of this so-called Ph-like ALL, this variant has deletions in key transcription factors involved in B cell development, including IKAROS family zinc finger 1 (IKZF1), factor transcription 3 (E2A),   Early B-cytokine 1 (EBF1) and matched box 5 (PAX5).

Most clinical manifestations of ALL reflect the accumulation of poorly differentiated malignant lymphocytes. Bone marrow, peripheral blood, and extramedullary cells.

The presentation may be non-specific, with systemic symptoms and signs of bone marrow failure (anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia).

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate

Common symptoms include type “B” symptoms (fever, weight loss, night sweats), easy bleeding or bruising, fatigue, difficulty breathing, and infections.

Involvement of extramedullary sites usually occurs and can cause lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, or hepatomegaly in 20% of patients.

Central nervous system involvement at diagnosis occurs in 5% to 8% of patients, and the most common manifestations are cranial nerve defects or meningitis. T-cell ALL can also manifest as mediastinal masses.

If there is 20% or more, the diagnosis is true. Lymphoblasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood. Morphological evaluation, flow cytometry, immunophenotyping, and cytogenetic testing are all valuable for diagnosis and risk stratification. Lumbar puncture and CSF analysis are the standard of care for evaluating CNS involvement at diagnosis.

If the central nervous system is affected, an MRI of the brain should be performed. Other evaluations include complete blood counts, classification, and smears to evaluate other hematopoietic cell lines, coagulation characteristics, and serum chemistry. Baseline uric acid, calcium, phosphate, and lactate dehydrogenase should be recorded to monitor tumor lysis syndrome.

Etiology of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate

Greaves’ review of the genetics, cell biology, immunology, and epidemiology of childhood leukemia concluded that B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has a multifactorial etiology, with genetic mutations and exposure to infection in two steps process.

The first step occurs in the uterus when the formation of the fusion gene or hyperdiploid produces a pre-leukemic clone in disguise.

The second step is to obtain secondary genetic changes after birth, which promotes the transformation into obvious leukemia.

Only 1% of cloned children with congenital leukemia will develop leukemia. The second step is caused by infection.

Children with dysregulated immune responses are more likely to be activated because they have not been exposed to infection in the first few weeks and months after birth.

Lack of exposure to these early infections, which can strengthen the immune system, is more likely to occur in a society that is jealous of hygiene; this will help explain why today’s industrialized society mainly sees pediatric ALL.

Compared with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the etiology of adult ALL is poorly understood.

Although the majority of leukemias that occur after radiation exposure are AML rather than ALL, a higher prevalence of ALL has been observed among Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors, but a higher prevalence of ALL has been observed among Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors.

Genetic susceptibility

A genome-wide association study on the susceptibility of adolescents and young adults to all or any identified a big susceptibility site in GATA3: rs3824662 (odds ratio 1.77) and rs3781093 (OR 1.73). Other studies have shown that the increased risk of ALL is said to the subsequent polymorphisms.

  • MMP-8 promoter genotypes
  • Arylamine N-acetyltransferases 1 and 2
  • PIP4K2A
  • HLA alleles
  • IKZF1
  • ARID5B
  • LHPP
  • CDKN2A
  • ELK3

Epidemiology of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate

ALL, like cancer in general, is likely to result from the interaction between exogenous or endogenous exposure, genetic (genetic) susceptibility, and opportunity.

These factors explain that the risk of childhood ALL (0-15 years) in 2000 was approximately one in one.

The challenge is to determine the relevant exposure and genetic variation and evolve from its onset (usually in the womb) to its largely insidious evolution into an obvious disease.

This task is complicated by the relative rarity of ALL and the existence of different biological subtypes that may not have a common etiological mechanism. 

For example, ALL in infants (<12 months) is usually associated with MLL gene rearrangement and significantly higher agreement.

In identical twins (singletons or monochorionic placenta close to 100%), leukemia is mostly completed at birth.  In contrast, B-ALL that has not been rearranged by MLL has the highest incidence between 2 and 5 years, with an incidence of 10-15%, indicating that although it is common in the uterus, it may require other “Facilitative” exposure can only develop later.

Subtypes of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate

In 1976, a group of leukemia and cancer research experts (FAB) from France, the United States, and the United Kingdom gathered together to classify ALL into subtypes based on the appearance of cells under a microscope after routine staining. The FAB classification system divides the types of acute lymphoblastic leukemia into:

L1: uniform small cells

L2: large and variable cells

L3: large and variable cells with vacuoles (bubble-like characteristics)

World Health Organization (WHO) final It is recommended that FAB classification be rejected because it has nothing to do with prognosis. WHO scientists have created a more precise breakdown based on the type of cancerous WBC and other characteristics. By using the WHO system to identify ALL, your cancer care team can better plan treatment.

There are 3 subtypes:

Precursor B cell ALL-the most common type in adults

Precursor T cell ALL: More likely to affect young and male

Mature B cell ALL (Burkitt ALL): Recognize similarities through specific genetic changes ALL

Philadelphia chromosome (Ph-like ALL) is a precursor B-cell ALL that can cause chromosomal changes in leukemia cells.

Normal cells in your body have 23 pairs of chromosomes, and they grow and divide at a certain speed, but the ALL similar to Ph can cause genetic damage to chromosome 9 and attach itself to chromosome 22.

This new gene causes cells to produce too much protein, which stimulates the proliferation of leukemia cells. The Philadelphia chromosome is present in 20-30% of ALL B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

This is a fast-growing subtype in which there are excessive amounts of immature white blood cells in the bone marrow and blood, called B-cell lymphocytes.

These subtypes are distinguished by genetic differences in leukemia cells. Normal cells have 46 chromosomes.

There are many different types of B-cell ALL that have genetic changes, such as changes in the number of chromosomes or excessive duplication.

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) has characteristics similar to certain types of lymphoma.

The National Cancer Institute defines it as fast-growing blood cancer in which there are too many immature blood cells (T-cell lymphoblasts) in the blood and bone marrow.

Early T-cell precursor lymphocytic leukemia is a type of T-ALL that has historically been associated with a poor prognosis.

Symptoms of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate

The symptoms of acute lymphoblastic leukemia may be unclear and non-specific. The signs and symptoms of ALL include:

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate
  • Fever
  • Fatigue
  • Frequent infections
  • Shortness of breath, difficulty breathing
  • Dizzy or lightheaded
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Pale skin and nails
  • Nosebleeds
  • Body pain
  • Bleeding gums
  • Easy bruising
  • Palpitations
  • Bone or joint pain
  • Prolonged bleeding following injuries and during menstruation
  • Loss of appetite and weight
  • Swollen lymph nodes around the neck, underarm, stomach, or groin

Diagnosis of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate

Morphological identification of lymphoblasts by a microscope and immunophenotyping of lineage typing and developmental stage by flow cytometry are essential for the correct diagnosis of ALL.

Chromosome analysis still plays an important role in the initial cytogenetic analysis. RT-PCR, FISH/multiplex dependent probe amplification and flow cytometry are used to identify leukemia-specific translocations, submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities and cellular DNA content, respectively.

Once whole genome analysis becomes cost-effective and over time, it can replace many current diagnostic techniques. The techniques may also-

Blood tests: A complete blood count (CBC) shows the number of each type of blood cell you have. Peripheral blood smears check for changes in the appearance of blood cells.

Bone marrow examination: Your doctor will insert a needle into the bone in your chest or hip and take a bone marrow sample. The specialist will check you under a microscope for signs of leukemia.

Imagine test: X-rays, CT scans, or ultrasound can tell your doctor if cancer has spread.

Spinal Tap: This is also called a lumbar puncture. Your doctor will use a needle to require a sample of fluid from around your medulla spinalis. A specialist can examine you to see if cancer has reached your brain or spinal cord.

Your doctor may also test your blood or bone marrow for chromosomal changes or look for markers on cancer cells. The results will provide them with more information about the type of leukemia you have and help them plan your treatment.

Risk factors of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate

Take a look

  • Being white
  • Being male
  • Contact with high levels of radiation to treat other sorts of cancer.
  • Contact chemically like benzene, a solvent utilized in oil refineries and other industries and located in cigarette smoke; and a few cleaning products, detergents, and paint strippers.
  • Human T-cell lymphoma/leukemia virus-1 (HTLV-1) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, mainly outside the United States
  • Having a medical condition that’s tied to your genes, like mongolism

Clinical and biological factors

Age (infant or more than 10 years old), white blood cell count, race, male sex, and T-cell immunophenotype have been considered unfavorable clinical prognostic factors for children, although their influence is weakened by modern therapies with increased adaptation risks and supportive care. Infants with 2-6 MLL rearrangement, especially those younger than 6 months, have a white blood cell count >300×109/L at the time of diagnosis, and the prognosis is still poor.

Cytogenetics and molecular risk factors have been discussed before. Race/ethnic differences in prognosis are not only related to socioeconomic factors, but also to differences in genome changes.

For example, the single nucleotide germline polymorphisms of PDE4B70 and ARID5B71 have been shown to be related to Native American genetic lineage, and CRLF2 somatic rearrangement in ALL blasts is excessive in Hispanic children; these changes have been found to help the result of lowering Hispanics.

By adding a delayed intensive treatment cycle to reduce the poor prognosis given by genetic ancestry. Adolescents and adults have a higher prevalence of high biological risk leukemia, a lower incidence of Leia type, and lower adherence and tolerance to treatment.

Especially those over 60 years old and the presence of high white blood cell counts are also factors for the poor prognosis of this population.

Recent studies have shown that pediatric programs are more effective than adult programs.

Pediatric programs usually provide higher doses of non-myelosuppressive drugs, early and frequent intrathecal treatment, re-induction and prolonged maintenance phases, and rigorous monitoring.

Response to therapy

Early treatment response is predictive of the risk of relapse and is used to assign patients to subsequent risk-adapted therapy.

Methods that track residual leukaemic cells by flow cytometry (detecting aberrant immunophenotypes) and by PCR amplification (detecting leukaemia-specific immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes or fusion transcripts) allow the recognition of ALL cells present at levels well below those detectable by microscopic morphologic assessment, ie, minimal residual disease (MRD).

MRD is currently the most powerful prognostic indicator in childhood and adult ALL, even in patients with low-risk features at presentation.

The kinetics of MRD clearance in response to identical remission-induction chemotherapy differed between B- and T-ALL; negative MRD on day 33 (after administration of 4 drugs) was the strongest prognostic think about B-ALL, while negative MRD on day 78 (after 7 drugs) was also predictive in T-ALL, regardless of positive MRD on day 33.80

PCR is typically more sensitive than flow cytometry for measurement of MRD (~0.001% vs ~0.01%), and PCR-measurable low levels of MRD (0.001 to < 0.01%) after remission-induction therapy showed prognostic significance in childhood ALL.

However, flow cytometry is faster, generally less expensive, and applicable to a larger proportion of patients, allowing early tailoring of therapy.

The sensitivity of flow cytometry can be improved by using multi-color combinations of additional leukaemia-associated markers identified from differently expressed genes in ALL cells, yielding a detection threshold of ~0.001%.

Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate


Most cancers are divided into stages, supported by how far they’ve spread. But with ALL, doctors describe it as consistent with treatment.

Untreated: this is often a replacement diagnosis. You would possibly are treated for symptoms but not for cancer itself.

Remission: You have received treatment to kill as many leukemia cells as possible. His complete blood count is normal, and less than 5% of the cells in his bone marrow are leukemia cells.

Recurrent: this is often cancer that’s come after treatment and remission.


The treatment of ALL usually lasts 2 to 2.5 years and includes 3 stages:

  1. Remission induction
  2. Reinforcement (or consolidation) and
  3. Continuous (or maintenance)

Most of the drugs this disease used were developed before 1970. However, their dosages and dosing schedules in combination chemotherapy have been optimized based on the biological characteristics of leukemia cells, response to treatment (ERM), and pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenomics research results.

 Patients, leading to the current high survival rate. Give central nervous system (CNS) targeted therapy to prevent recurrence caused by leukemia cells isolated in the shelter. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is considered for very high-risk patients.

This section will focus on the most important developments in the treatment of ALL in the past 5 years.

Remission induction therapy

Remission induction therapy for 4 to 6 weeks eliminated the initial burden of leukemia cells and restored normal hematopoietic function in 96% to 99% of children and 78% to 92% of adults.

Chemotherapy drugs usually include glucocorticoids (prednisone or dexamethasone), vincristine, and asparaginase, with or without anthracyclines. If intensive post-remission treatment is given, this regimen seems to be sufficient for standard-risk ALL. High-risk or extremely high-risk patients receive four or more drugs.

Prednisone (or prednisolone) is traditionally used in the treatment of ALL, but dexamethasone is increasingly being considered. However, the optimal dosage and bioequivalence of these drugs are still unclear.

In prospective randomized trials, dexamethasone has better control of CNS leukemia, and when the prednisone/dexamethasone dose ratio is <7, it has produced a better event-free survival rate, especially for previous treatments.

Children with T-ALL and children with ALL-B who have responded well to prednisone stage treatment are under 10 years of age. However, when higher doses of prednisolone were used (dose ratio> 7), there was no difference in the efficacy of the two drugs.

Glucocorticoid therapy is associated with adverse reactions, including infection, osteonecrosis, fractures, psychosis, and myopathy. The incidence of dexamethasone is usually higher than that of prednisone.

Therefore, it is not recommended to use high doses of dexamethasone (for example, 10 mg/m2/day) in adolescent B-ALL. There are currently three asparaginase preparations: succinimide conjugates derived from Escherichia coli, Erwinia, and Escherichia coli. Escherichia coli L-asparaginase (PEG-asparaginase) monoethyl Oxypolyethylene glycol succinimide. Since these preparations have different half-lives (PEG-asparaginase> Escherichia coli> Erwinia).

It is important to maintain the consumption of asparagine by optimizing the dosage strength and time of the asparaginase used. PEG-asparaginase has largely replaced natural products because it can provide at least 2 weeks of therapeutic activity after a single administration, and the frequency of inducing antibodies is low.

According to reports, natural E. coli and PEG-asparaginase activities are negatively correlated with resistance to E. coli. E. coli asparaginase antibody titers, although PEG-asparaginase is only inhibited at high antibody titers.

Therefore, PEG-asparaginase can be considered when the antibody titer is low or medium, and Owen asparaginase should be considered when the antibody titer is high.

A significant pharmacokinetic interaction between glucocorticoids and asparaginase has been observed. It was found that higher systemic exposure of asparaginase was associated with higher dexamethasone exposure, which may be due to poor liver synthesis of proteins involved in dexamethasone clearance.

Therefore, anti-asparaginase antibodies may reduce exposure to these two drugs and may increase the risk of recurrence. BCR-ABL1 ALL positive patients are considered to have a poor prognosis, but early use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (such as imatinib, imatinib, dasatinib).

When the drug is added to multi-drug chemotherapy, the complete remission rate is> 90%, and the event-free survival rate is higher than the historical control. Unlike imatinib, dasatinib targets both ABL1 and Src kinase; it also has stronger activity on BCR-ABL1, and BCR-ABL1 that is resistant to imatinib is active (except for the T315I mutation), and has better central nervous system penetration.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and cellular therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is considered for children with very high-risk ALL and/or persistent disease.

Modern HSCT protocols with high-resolution HLA typing, case-based conditioning, and improved supportive care reduce mortality associated with recurrence, toxicity, and infection associated with treatment options.

In addition, regardless of the source of the stem cells, the survival rate is comparable. In view of the continuous development of disease detection and first-line treatment, the indications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation need to be continuously re-evaluated.

The pre-HSCT ERM level ≥10-4 is closely related to recurrence, and new strategies are needed to reduce the burden of disease before and/or after HSCT. BCR-ABL1-positive ALL patients who achieved remission after ABL1 kinase inhibitor multi-drug chemotherapy and ALL B children (<6 years old) who have delayed remission after induction failure may not be treated with HSCT.

The benefits of HSCT for infants with ALL are controversial. The effect of HSCT, if any, is limited to a small high-risk population. Although many adult centers have considered HSCT during the first complete remission as a key element of treatment, pediatric treatment options will reduce its use.

Intensification (consolidation) therapy

After induction of remission, intensive (consolidation) treatment is performed to eradicate the remaining leukemia cells.

This stage usually uses high doses (example- 1 to 8 g/m2) of methotrexate (MTX) and frequent pulses of mercaptopurine, vincristine, and glucocorticoids, and uninterrupted asparaginase for 20 to 30 weeks. And use drugs similar to those used during referral for re-induction therapy.

The accumulation of MTX polyglutamic acid (MTXPG1-7), the active metabolite of MTX, in leukemia cells is related to the anti-leukemia activity.

The results may be affected by germline and somatic genetic factors, MTX dose, and duration. And leucovorin to the rescue.

Somatic and functional enzymatic genetic studies have shown that the accumulation of MTXPG1-7 varies greatly among ALL subtypes, and is lower in ALL TCF3-PBX1, T ALL, and ETV6-RUNX1 ALL, and in hyperdiploid.

ALL B Medium is higher, especially when the chromosome increases by 18 or 10; therefore, the former group may benefit from higher doses of MTX. 103-105 It was found that the germline single nucleotide polymorphism of the organic anion transporter polypeptide SLCO1B1 was associated with the high clearance rate of MTX.

In high-risk ALL patients, high-dose MTX (5 g/m2, 4 doses, every 14 days) plus mercaptopurine is higher than MTX in a stepped dose (starting dose 100 mg/m2, increase by 50 mg/m2, 5 doses), Every 10 days adding PEG-asparaginase is more effective.

The duration of effective serum MTX levels is also important; compared with 24-hour infusion, 4 hours of high-dose MTX infusion has less accumulation of MTXPG1-7. Folinic acid is required after infusion of high-dose MTX.

However, its overuse may offset the anti-leukemia effect of MTX and increase the risk of recurrence. Re-induction therapy has proven to be a key element of the ALL regimen.

Intensive re-induction therapy with vincristine and asparaginase improved the prognosis of patients with high-risk ALL.

However, the same second reinduction cycle did not improve the prognosis of high-risk ALL patients with 7 days of induction therapy or rapid bone marrow response.

Patients with standard-risk ALL indicate that the remaining leukemia clones after a cycle of reinduction therapy may represent intrinsic drug resistance.

In the context of contemporary treatment, it is unclear whether the second re-induction cycle is beneficial for patients with high-risk ALL and slow early response.

Osteonecrosis often occurs after induction therapy, especially in children 10 years of age and older. Although the cumulative dose is higher, dosing every other week (days 0 to 6) and (days 14 to 20), 2 cycles, 10 mg/m²/day) instead of continuous dosing (days 0 to 20, Cycle 1) can significantly reduce osteonecrosis.

CNS-directed therapy

Controlling CNS disease is a key component of ALL treatment. Preventive craniocerebral irradiation can effectively control the disease, but its use has recently been reduced or canceled to prevent acute neurotoxicity, neurocognitive deficits, endocrine diseases, secondary malignant tumors, and high late-stage mortality.

Patients with a high risk of central nervous system recurrence, including any central nervous system involvement (including leukemia cell contamination caused by traumatic lumbar puncture) and/or T-ALL patients, should receive intensive intrathecal therapy during the early remission induction period.

Craniocerebral irradiation can only be used for rescue treatment because the recovery rate of patients with isolated CNS recurrence who did not receive irradiation during initial treatment is very high. In a randomized study of standard risk ALL, triple intrathecal therapy reduced the frequency of CNS Compared with single-drug intrathecal injection of methotrexate.

The recurrence is related to the increased risk of bone marrow and testicular recurrence, possibly due to the lower intensity of systemic treatment. In St. Jude Total XV, not only excellent CNS results were achieved, but also excellent overall results (5-year event-free survival rate, 85.6%; overall survival rate, 93.5%). 

Such as hematological relapse and CNS is Competitive events, systemic chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate, enhanced asparaginase, and dexamethasone, plus early risk-based intensive intrathecal chemotherapy, play an important role in preventing central nervous system recurrence.

Continuation therapy

Continuous treatment usually lasts 2 years or longer and consists mainly of daily mercaptopurine and weekly methotrexate, with or without pulses of vincristine and dexamethasone.

Makatorpurine and thioguanine are structural analogs of hypoxanthine and guanine, respectively, and they inhibit the de novo synthesis of purine.

Although thioguanine requires fewer steps to form the nucleotides of the active metabolite thioguanine and is more cytotoxic to lymphoblasts in vitro, random studies have not consistently shown that thioguanine survives event-free or general survival and extended dose benefit 40 mg/m2/day is associated with death in remission, venous occlusive disease, portal hypertension, and thrombocytopenia.

Therefore, mercaptopurine is the first choice to continue treatment. Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) catalyzes the S-methylation of thiopurine to inactive methylated metabolites.

Patients with homozygous or heterozygous TPMT deficiency will experience moderate to severe bone marrow suppression when receiving thiopurine therapy. 

They may also develop secondary malignancies, especially at higher doses (for example, mercaptopurine 75 mg/m2/day).

In addition, compliance with the planned dose rate of mercaptopurine <95% is associated with recurrence.

Therefore, uninterrupted pharmacogenetic-based mercaptopurine administration is important. After thioguanine nucleotide is incorporated into DNA, the DNA mismatch repair enzyme exerts cytotoxicity.

The lack of such enzymes (such as MSH2) makes leukemia cells resistant to thiopurine.

In newly diagnosed ALL children, due to somatic deletion of partial or complete genes that regulate MSH2 degradation (FRAP1), approximately 11% of MSH2 expression is low or undetectable, HERC1, PRKCZ, and PIK3C2B). These children have a high recurrence rate.


What’s the survival rate of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults?

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) trusted sources estimate that 5,960 people in the United States were diagnosed with ALL in 2018. Approximately 1,470 people died from the disease in 2018.

Various factors can determine the survival rate, such as survival rate. Age and subtype at diagnosis NCI report that the five-year survival rate in the United States is 68.1%.

However, these numbers are constantly increasing. From 1975 to 1976, the five-year survival rate for all age groups was less than 40%. Although most people diagnosed with ALL are children, the highest proportion of Americans with ALL die between the ages of 65 and 74.

The American Cancer Society estimates that overall, approximately 40% of adults with ALL are considered cured at some point in the treatment process. However, these cure rates depend on many factors, such as ALL subtype and age at diagnosis.

If a person has complete remission for five years or more, they “cure” ALL. But because cancer may recur, doctors cannot be 100% sure that a person has been cured. The best they can say is whether there were signs of cancer at that time.

Moreover the 5-year relative survival rate of ALL is 68.8%. The statistics are further broken down into 90% for children and 30-40% for adults. Although childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is more common than other types of cancer, the cure rate is high.

Adults are far less likely to have acute lymphoblastic leukemia than children. Every year, ALL accounts for one-fifth of all acute leukemia cases in adults 20 years and older. In fact, 2 out of every 100,000 people in the United States are at risk of being diagnosed with ALL throughout their lives.

What factors affect the survival rate?

There are several factors that affect a person’s survival rate after the diagnosis of ALL, such as the person’s age or white blood cell count at the time of diagnosis.

Doctors consider each of these factors when providing a person’s perspective; however, it is important to remember that this perspective is a doctor’s estimate of survival based on the diagnostic information they currently have.

What effect does age have on the survival rate?

According to the NCI, some studies have found that folks have a far better chance of survival if they’re 35 years old or under. Generally, older adults with ALL will typically have a poorer outlook than younger people.

Children are considered at higher risk if they’re over age 10.

Can acute lymphoblastic leukemia be detected early?

There is no test to detect ALL early, so it is important to observe your body for any possible symptoms. If you report these possible symptoms to a medical professional, you will get the first screening test as soon as possible.

Many of these symptoms are not unique to ALL and require further investigation. After reporting your concerns to your healthcare provider, they will perform a medical history and physical exams, laboratory tests, and blood smears.

If the blood test results show an increase in the number of white blood cells and lymphoblasts in the circulating blood, it may mean that the bone marrow is producing a large number of lymphoid cells.

To determine the specific type of leukemia the patient has. Chest X-rays and scans are usually done to look for swollen lymph nodes or cancer cells that have spread to other affected areas. Leukemia cells are sometimes found in the brain and spinal fluid also called cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

Can acute lymphoblastic leukemia be cured?

The 5-year relative survival rate describes the proportion of the population that survives 5 years after cancer diagnosis and the proportion of the general population that is expected to survive at the same time.

The medical profession believes that if acute lymphocytic leukemia is completely remitted for 10 years, it can be cured. Up to 98% of ALL children enter remission within about a month after treatment, and 9 out of 10 can be cured.

However, cancer always has a chance to recur, so it is important to follow up with the cancer care team as needed. During these treatments, approximately 80-90% of adults will get relief. The general cure rate for adults is 40%.

How long are you able to live with acute lymphoblastic leukemia?

Some people with ALL are ready to get obviate all of the cancer cells. For others, cancer might not get away, and that they may have more regular treatments of chemotherapy, radiation, or other therapies.

Finally, others may decide against treatment. Those that prefer to forgo treatment for lymphocytic leukemia specialize in relieving their symptoms and maximizing the time they need.

What type of leukemia is the most deadly?

Based on the genetic characteristics of cancer, patients with the deadliest form of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) usually only survive 4 to 6 months after diagnosis, even with aggressive chemotherapy.

How does one respond and seek support?

It is never easy to hear your doctor tell you that you have cancer. However, many types of ALL are highly treatable. During your treatment, there are many ways to support you to complete this journey. Here are some methods you can use:

Research the disease

Knowing more information from well-researched and respected organizations can help you understand your condition and care as much as possible. Some examples of important resources include:

  • American Cancer Society
  • Leukemia & Lymphoma Society

Communicate with your medical team

Cancer treatment usually involves a team approach to your care. Many cancer organizations have cancer navigators who can provide you with resources and support. Many health professionals can provide support for you or your loved ones. They include:

  • Psychiatrists
  • Dietitians
  • Child life specialists
  • Social workers
  • Case managers
  • Chaplains

Consider adjuvant treatments

Treatments that promote relaxation and relieve stress can complement your medical care. Examples might include massage or acupuncture. Before starting any supplemental treatments (such as herbal medicine, vitamins, or special diets), be sure to consult your doctor.

Create a sharing point for friends and relatives

You may encounter many people who want to help or receive the latest news about your performance throughout the treatment. If you are willing to share these updates, please consider a web page like Caring Bridge. For those who want to help, there are resources like Meal Train. Allow friends to register for meals. It is important to remember that there are many friends, family, and organizations that want to help you with ALL treatment and recovery.


  • Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunger SP, Lu X, Devidas M, et al. Improved Survival for Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Between 1990 and 2005: A Report From the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pieters R, Schrappe M, De Lorenzo P, et al. A treatment protocol for infants younger than 1 year with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Interfant-99): an observational study and a multicentre randomized trial. Lancet. 2007;370:240–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Greaves MF, Maia AT, Wiemels JL, Ford AM. Leukemia in twins: lessons in natural history. Blood. 2003;102:2321–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Preston DL, Kusumi S, Tomonaga M, et al. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III: Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950–1987. Radiat Res. 1994;137 (Suppl): S68–S97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kendall G, Little MP, Wakeford R. Numbers and proportions of leukemias in young people and adults induced by radiation of natural origin. Leuk Res. 2011;35:1039–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schüz J. Exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and the risk of childhood cancer: update of the epidemiological evidence. Progr Biophysics Mol Biol. 2011;107:339–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zammarchi F, Williams DG, Adams L, Havenith K, Chivers S, D’Hooge F et al. Pre-Clinical Development of Act-402, a Novel Pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD)-Based Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC) Targeting CD19-Expressing B-Cell Malignancies. Blood 2015; 126: 1564. [Google Scholar]
  • Flynn MJ, Berkel PHv, Zammarchi F, Tyrer PC, Akarca AU, Janghra N et al. Pre-Clinical Activity of Act-301, a Novel Pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) Dimer-Containing Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC) Targeting CD25-Expressing Hematological Malignancies. Blood 2014; 124: 4491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Messinger YH, Gaynon PS, Sposto R, v.d. Giessen J, Eckroth E, Malvar J et al. Bortezomib with chemotherapy is highly active in advanced B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia & Lymphoma (TACL) Study. Blood 2012; 120: 285–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vijayakrishnan J, Houlston RS. Candidate gene association studies and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Haematologica. 2010;95:1405–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Trevino LR, Yang W, French D, et al. Germline genomic variants associated with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1001–05. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mullighan CG, Goorha S, Radtke I, et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nature. 2007;446:758–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  •  Mullighan CG, Miller CB, Radtke I, et al. BCR-ABL1 lymphoblastic leukemia is characterized by the deletion of Ikaros. Nature. 2008;453:110–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]35. Mullighan CG, Zhang J, Harvey RC, et al. JAK mutations in high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9414–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Iacobucci I, Storlazzi CT, Cilloni D, et al. Identification and molecular characterization of recurrent genomic deletions on 7p12 in the IKZF1 gene in a large cohort of BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: on behalf of Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’Adulto Acute Leukemia Working Party (GIMEMA AL WP) Blood. 2009;114:2159–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mullighan CG, Su X, Zhang J, et al. Deletion of IKZF1 and Prognosis in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:470–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Den Boer ML, van Slegtenhorst M, De Menezes RX, et al. A subtype of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with poor treatment outcome: a genome-wide classification study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:125–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoda A, Yoda Y, Chiaretti S, et al. Functional screening identifies CRLF2 in precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:252–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hertzberg L, Vendramini E, Ganmore I, et al. Down syndrome acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a highly heterogeneous disease in which aberrant expression of CRLF2 is associated with mutated JAK2: a report from the iBFM Study Group. Blood. 2010;115:1006–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

1 thought on “Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Adults survival rate with details”

%d bloggers like this: